-- Huffingtonpost.comPolitical observers frequently comment that there is little difference between Clinton and Obama on the issues, and certainly this is true. But by now it is also clear that the two candidates have very different political temperaments. Clinton is a problem-solver whose approach is methodical, incremental and serial. In her speeches, she talks about the tasks ahead as if they were beads to be strung one-by-one. Obama, on the other hand, looks at the country's problems from a larger viewpoint. Despite all his policy papers and the details of his various plans, Obama is never able to overcome the impression listeners have that he is not really interested in all the specifics the way Clinton is. And these potential voters are right. Obama has a vision of where he wants to take the country, and certainly he keeps his eye on the major road markers. But Obama is the candidate with the bigger picture. He has that rare quality of mind for holding opposite perspectives in equilibrium. At one and the same time, he can keep the entire landscape in view while synchronizing all the foreground details.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/pennsylvania-voters-dismi_b_94393.html
-----
Based solely on the quote, the speaker describes Mrs. Clinton as male mental sex (linear problem-solving), and Mr. Obama as female mental sex (holistic problem-solving). This is the same switcheroo as in The X-files.
If you have any real life examples of Menal Sex in action, please share them here. It's always fun to find new ways to understand complex concepts found in Dramatica and real world examples are high on my list.