Star Wars: isn't Han Solo the impact character?
Posted: Aug 13, 2013 12:28 pm
Han and Luke clash over whether the story goal should be carried out for profit (Han) or the benefit to others (Luke). They have diametrically opposed value systems and each tries to get the other to come around to his take on the issue.
In the end, Han gives in and changes the way he feels about the issue (by risking his life to join the attack on the Death Star even though he's already been paid). He doesn't fully accept Luke's belief system, especially all the hokey stuff about ancient religion, but he has certainly changed his attitude regarding the central issue. Ultimately, Luke's impact on Han made it possible to destroy the Death Star and achieve the story goal.
In the Dramatica theory PDF, though, it's Obi Wan who's identified as the impact character. Shouldn't it be Han?
In the end, Han gives in and changes the way he feels about the issue (by risking his life to join the attack on the Death Star even though he's already been paid). He doesn't fully accept Luke's belief system, especially all the hokey stuff about ancient religion, but he has certainly changed his attitude regarding the central issue. Ultimately, Luke's impact on Han made it possible to destroy the Death Star and achieve the story goal.
In the Dramatica theory PDF, though, it's Obi Wan who's identified as the impact character. Shouldn't it be Han?